Democrats apparently believe that a “compelling life story” and irrational emotionalism makes for a better Supreme Court justice than sound judicial philosophy grounded in a respect for the Constitution and the proper role of the courts.
Democrats apparently believe that a “compelling life story” and irrational emotionalism makes for a better Supreme Court justice than sound judicial philosophy grounded in a respect for the Constitution and the proper role of the courts.
[The National Scene is proudly powered by WordPress.]