
The heads of Obama’s national debt commission recently said, “this debt is like a cancer.” Erskine Bowles added that, “it is truly going to destroy the country from within.” He ostensibly fretted: “Just think about that: All that money, going somewhere else, to create jobs and opportunity somewhere else.” Almost sounds like redistributing our wealth.
I came across this article by Zubi Diamond in which he warns:
If anything, the passing of this financial reform bill is a guarantee that the U.S. economy is not going to recover, and that the stock market will crash again and again and again, leading to more job losses and increased unemployment.
Why are they doing this? Tim Geithner just gave you the answer. They do not want the United States of America to drive global growth anymore…They are bursting what George Soros calls the bubble of American supremacy in order to achieve global equilibrium among nations.
Obama’s “science czar,” John Holdren, is another example of someone high in the administration that has spoken and written about de-developing America in order to transfer wealth to other nations (not to mention his support for forced abortions and euthanasia).
Holdren has talked about international wealth redistribution in his writing, as well as the alleged need to keep developing countries from the urge to “mimic overdevelopment,” which apparently has occurred in the United States and other Western countries.
In a 1977 college textbook he co-wrote, “Ecoscience,” for example, Holdren said the United States must set an example for the world by undergoing “dedevelopment,” and that wealth must be redistributed “with and among nations.”
“The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge,” he and his co-authors Paul and Anne Ehrlich wrote. “They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than in the present one.”
Holdren believes for some bizarre reason that America is overdeveloped, but the fact is less than 3.5% of our landmass is considered “developed” urban area.
Dr. Donald Berwick, Obama’s newly appointed administrator of Medicare and Medicaid, has insisted that health care systems must ration care and redistribute wealth. “Excellent health care is by definition redistributional,” Berwick said in a speech delivered on July 1, 2008. Excellent health care means people who are treated for illness actually get better; it has nothing to do with being “redistributional,” except to the radical allies of the president.
George Soros is also closely involved and actively working through a number of groups, such as the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) to destroy American capitalism (what’s left of it). He said that “regime” change to socialism might be possible under very difficult economic conditions. What a coincidence. And if that isn’t bad enough:
A group backed by Soros is gearing up to steal the 2012 election for President Obama and congressional Democrats by installing left-wing Democrats as secretaries of state across the nation. From such posts, secretaries of state can help tilt the electoral playing field.
This is, of course, the same Soros, the same hyperpolitical left-wing philanthropist who makes no secret of his intention to destroy capitalism. In an interview with Der Spiegel last year, Soros said European-style socialism “is exactly what we need now.”
Center for American Progress president Podesta, who helped run the Obama transition team, is on Soros’s payroll and has visited the White House at least 37 times.
Andy Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which is an institutional member of Soros’s Democracy Alliance, has visited the White House at least 38 times.
Furthermore, the Cloward-Piven strategy seems to be in play, which essentially seeks to overload the government with welfare and entitlements to the point of economic collapse. Jerome Corsi writes:” Is President Obama intentionally placing so many on the government dole, including the inclusion of illegal aliens in Obamacare, because he wants to bankrupt the United States to destroy the private-enterprise system, following the lead of the leftist radicals that employed the Cloward-Piven strategy to bankrupt New York City in the 1970s?”
None of this is conspiratorial because no one is making up their statements or what they want to achieve. These are things they openly admit.
So going back to the original question I think the answer is crystal clear and spells disaster for the American people. Like other times and other places, it’s always the people who suffer for the misguided Utopian crusades of ideologues in power.















Most Americans have never heard of the leftist End Game, if they did they would understand where Obama intends to take America.
Historically leftists have believed Socialism/Marxism can only be achieved through deceit, lies and sacrificing anyone to advance their cause. Obama has already sacrificed the trust of Americans, repeatedly lied about most everything since he took office, and in the run up to the White House duped middle of the road Democrats to elect him President. Now Obama is ready to sacrifice the entire Democratic Party next election, giving amnesty to 12 million illegal immigrants. Middle of the road Democrats just can’t understand why Obama will throw them under the bus in November if he can get amnesty first for 12 million illegal immigrants. Obama wants to insure that when he leaves office, 12 million illegal immigrants can stay in the U.S., and the border is still open so 12 million more illegal immigrants can enter America; that will insure Obama’s leftist constituency can find back to back—several million foreign born residents to push a Marxist U.S. Government. Do Americans actually think anything they say in protest will discourage Mexican illegal immigrants moving to their state? Mexican illegal immigrants come from a country where force is commonplace. But illegal immigrants do understand getting arrested by police and that is why they have to shut down Arizona’s new anti-immigration law. Arizona’s new law threatens the leftist agenda that includes overburdening financially U.S. Government, local and state infrastructures to cause economic chaos.
Leftists historically move on democracies to take power when things are in chaos. Obama is now in position to cause that chaos. But unexpectedly, to the dismay of the left, Americans in state after state are standing up to support Arizona. If the Arizona law passes in enough states, and amnesty does not pass, the leftists will have lost a strong weapon to destroy America.
Consequently leftists have become desperate and are now in the process of trying to consolidate 170 liberal and civil rights groups into a coalition to match the Tea Party’s political energy and influence—this should be taken seriously. The first question: “Who are the players behind this new liberal coalition?”
Historically in America, leftists have displayed a victim mentality, giving up, not voting after the political tide turned against them, as it has now. Obama as a Presidential candidate managed to motivate and hold leftist factions together; and gain the support of ethic groups that prior, were at odds. However, since the election Obama’s policies have fractured the left, Obama has lost most Independents. So who is going to organize and motivate the new coalition of 170 liberal and civil rights groups? In other countries, to affect the outcome of elections, extreme leftists have formed liberal and human rights coalitions covertly coordinated by Communists and labor unions.
Typically when communists are concerned they will lose elections, they cause chaos, creating protests; obscure important issues with misinformation to confuse voters, so they will vote for their leftist candidates. In America should Communists be identified, playing an integral role in the new 170 liberal/civil rights groups’ coalition, Patriots should vehemently expose early the communists and their associations. Millions of younger Americans, thanks to the educational system, don’t comprehend that communism calls for the overthrow of democratic governments as the United States; and abolishing their Constitution.