Mainstream Media’s Shameful Coverage of Tea Parties

by @ 10:00 pm on April 16, 2009. Tags: , , , , , , ,
Filed under Government, Media

mainstream-media-bias-unfair-spin-liberal

Now that the national tea parties are over we see just how predictably dismissive and contemptuous the Big Media elites are.  Is there any doubt that if these protests were perceived as liberal or leftwing, that the mainstream media would have been covering it with glowing enthusiasm?

So what were some of the responses from the alphabet news outlets?

Dan Harris of ABC: “Cheered on by Fox News and talk radio, the hundreds of tea parties today were designed to protest the bailouts, the stimulus plan, and President Obama’s budget.” He continued with: “But critics on the left say this is not a real grassroots phenomenon at all, that it’s actually largely orchestrated by people fronting for corporate interests.”

The tea parties were a grassroots idea that started and spread across the internet. And this idea of linking conservatives or the rightwing to “corporate interests”, let’s set the record straight. Obama and the Democrats received far more money from corporate America than did McCain and Republicans. The Democratic Party is the new party of Wallstreet.

Dean Reynolds of CBS: “a fistful of rightward leaning Web sites and commentators embraced the cause.”

Notice how dismissive Reynolds is with his “fistful” description, minimizing the numbers which are much greater than a ‘fistful’.

Lee Cowan of NBC: “some observers suggest not all of it was as home-grown as it may seem”.

Again, a suggestion of deception on the part of the protestors; that perhaps the rightwing or corporations are behind it (the standard playbook response).

Anderson Cooper of CNN made an obscene sexual joke about the protestors. Imagine the outrage and calls for his firing if instead it was a code pink rally or some other liberal event. But because the protest is viewed as conservative, the insulting humor gets a free pass.

Susan Roesgen of CNN: (watch the video) “Anti-government, anti-CNN since this is highly promoted by the right-wing conservative network Fox and since I can’t really hear much more and I think this is not really family viewing.”

Roesgen probably had the most appalling performance of any reporter covering the event. Her condescending tone, smug look on her face, and obvious contempt for the protestors proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that America simply cannot trust the bias Big Media.

The tea parties were a grassroots protest from people of all backgrounds. It wasn’t staged or orchestrated by FOX news or any rightwing groups. It was ordinary working tax-paying citizens who are fed up with the taxes, spending, corruption and lies from the politicians in Washington, particularly the Obama Administration.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • Kirtsy
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Live
Print This Post Print This Post

3 Responses to “Mainstream Media’s Shameful Coverage of Tea Parties”

  1. brad says:

    whether the whole tea party idea was an idea cooked up by right wing leaders is debatable, but what isn’t debatable is how dumb it all was. the supposed taxes they were debated were only for the people making like $250,000 or more a year, which I’m gonna go out on a limb and assume is a bit more than the teabaggers make. the other taxes haven’t changed since they were originally set by Bush and a Republican congress. it’s pretty humorous.

    • SteveK says:

      First of all thank you for your comment, but you seem to miss the point. The $250,000 mark is a scam and unrealistic. There is no way the Democrats can quadruple spending and pay for it by just raising taxes on 1-2% of the entire population. Taxes will increase on everyone in more hidden ways. The event was against ALL tax and spenders, including Republicans who acted like Democrats. I saw many anti-Republican signs in the crowd. The point is this: is this Administration acting better or worse than the last when it comes to taxes and spending? The answer is worse. And calling them ‘teabaggers’ is an unnecessary slander.

  2. Dave says:

    Can we say “Carpet Munchers” on TV now?

    Nothing intrinsically offensive about that, is there?
    Sorta like “Teabagging”

    What would Rachel Maddow have to say about a Republican using that phrase?

    I would find that offensive.
    But, apparently CNN and MSNBC don’t have a problem with that.
    Unless it’s spoken by people opposed to their objectives.

    Best,
    Dave

[The National Scene is proudly powered by WordPress.]

FireStats icon Powered by FireStats
WP-Highlight